formerly contended, it would be my duty to call the Registrar's attention to the matter in order that he might report in the usual way. But here I seem to have failed to convey my meaning to Your Excellency. I apree that I should report grave dereliction of duty on the part of any Registry Officer to the Governor, as I in fact did with regard to Mr. Seth; but was referring in paragraphs 13 to 15 to cases which, surely it needs no arguments to show, are matters with which the Chief Justice must himself deal. They do not come within the term "grave dereliction of duty".
I do not think that Your Excellency would seriously contend that I should refer to the Governor any question similar to those mentioned in those paragraphs. What would be the result? The Governor would consult the Attorney-General, and would undertake to decide a question with which he could not have any familiarity; and meanwhile the business of the Court would go on being badly done. Work in these conditions would be impossible.
Nor can I think that Your Excellency seriously intends to urge that Mr. Seth should have reported his absence from duty to the Colonial Secretary who would then report to Your Excellency...
Page 297
...
Page 298
was not directly provided but the content suggest the page is continuing from 297. However, the original text was not properly formatted and had many OCR errors. The above response corrects some of these errors and formats the text into paragraphs. Here is the revised response in HTML format as requested:formerly contended, it would be my duty to call the Registrar's attention to the matter in order that he might report in the usual way. But here I seem to have failed to convey my meaning to Your Excellency. I agree that I should report grave dereliction of duty on the part of any Registry Officer to the Governor, as I in fact did with regard to Mr. Seth; but was referring in paragraphs 13 to 15 to cases which, surely it needs no arguments to show, are matters with which the Chief Justice must himself deal. They do not come within the term "grave dereliction of duty".
I do not think that Your Excellency would seriously contend that I should refer to the Governor any question similar to those mentioned in those paragraphs. What would be the result? The Governor would consult the Attorney-General, and would undertake to decide a question with which he could not have any familiarity; and meanwhile the business of the Court would go on being badly done. Work in these conditions would be impossible.
Nor can I think that Your Excellency seriously intends to urge that Mr. Seth should have reported his absence from duty to the Colonial Secretary who would then report to Your Excellency...
Page 297
...
Page 298
6U8
297
-Lao** \#0* wollo" commen I cada corner I
.bg Pam
.@
s to amigo I ads ot es, dqannexeq al-admæner a1gonel-
ODBI OVA or zagno I taut 20671. slic 00 8%A VO2m.alb
na minado of Yor feux tuo or ecottatnoanngor Layanan
tus .wath a gend riuole erootto viralşef øde cade zabru
5 10% 2god æsingib adt Koidu azie morcarnot I oriz bernav 1
fenomen exsin of tabro ut em bailqque ovad bluor XoeY
Prog Jam I mises TUŽ .vore feax3 woy or anottojmegeNIST
jadast ́ena bezstoenqqa don and yonelleox -10% zang
360
misch a to "nigs X arb of roter wo, 68U8000
-min mirit age 27 .Neew # 10: Valb e tu haigeen sit don
to razvel quoy mi vone lisɔx” wo¥ bel doldw możɛned-tiq®-
BOİTAR A" "nivlovni ano es tabĩa với adirogeh of Va?? .nực
brud dhow to noi.ibba
21 to 0L morit nodet oved blLow ci assteriw, "asso?" to
obart #X* ** 8.7 edalɔung (8 Just Jum ob I
.01
ylqar rahnu tezzel ada to ? Ausnutraq ni vorellanx?” way va
formerly contended, it would be my duty to call the
Registrar's attention to the matter in order that he
might report in the usual way. But here I seem to have
failed to convey my meaning to Your Excellency. I apree
that I should report grave dereliction of duty on the part
of any Registry Officer to the Governor, as I in fact did
with regard to Ir. Seth: but was referring in paragraphs
13 to 15 to cases which, surely it needs no arguments to
show, are matters with which the Chief Justice must
himself doal. They do not come within the tera # prave
dereliction of duty".
I do not think that Your Excellency would
seriously contend that I should refer to the Governor any
question similar to those mentioned in those paragraphs.
What would be the result the Governor would consult the
Attorney-General: and would undertake to decide a question
with which he could not have any familiarity: and meanwhile
the business of the Court would go onbeing badly done.
Work in these conditions would be impossible.
"
A27F0D48s
(vanh va as
are or wrozatyal o'r to tacitam the to yêuth to cokrolfensb
TI „Talf Inkoit^0 «larly ma I emilaoed om at si MOMOVOD
C
11.
Nor can I think that Your Excellency
lutenās seriously to urge that Mrg. Seth should have re-
-ported his absence from duty to the Colonial Secretary
251 86 (Jnentisqed to has” Jnahmegebet na et teszalnem ate
who would then report to Your Excellency, who would then
VINIA MOTt
informa
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.